Home About Find a Consultant How to Join Documents Links ECANSW Forum Positions Vacant


Available Topics
2009 ECA Conference 2010 ECA Conference Accreditation of Ecological Consultants Ants: The Natural Enemy of the Nest Box
Australia 2020 Summit Biobanking 2008: Its coming, ready or not... Biobanking assessor accreditation Biocertification
Blacks eating browns Blindsiding "Community Charity Magazine Advertising" Buffers Bush Tucker
Changes in Abundance of Migratory Shorebirds in Eastern Australia Coastal ecology Consultancy Fee Proposals Correct Spelling of Common Names of Bird Species
Damselfy on the Cover of Vol 21 Dead tree - stag or snag? Disturbances to Urban Waterbirds ECA Conference
ECA Conference 2008 ECA Workshops 2008 Elliott Trapping Ethical dilemma
Flora of the Sydney Region Flying-foxes and nectar in northern NSW GeneralNew strategic process for development to be tested in Kimberley Glossy Black Cockatoo Food Trees
How to Erect Nest Boxes and Recycled Hollow-Limbs Infrared Spotlights/Night Vision Optics Insurance Cover Introduction of native speices
Koalas Legal Responsibilities of Consultants Little Red Flying-foxes(?) At Penrith Marketing Scams
Marking Habitat Trees Miscellaneous Observations Mosquito Control NPWS Wildlife Atlas, Is it useful?
Nyctophilus timoriensis Planted threatened plants need 7 part test Pollution Law Prepaid Wireless Broadband
Published Field Guides RFEF on Coastal Floodplains: Where the bloody hell is it? Recommended Suppliers of Ecological Equipment Recycling office products
Reintroduction of native species Remote Sensor Digital Cameras Removing Tapes from Hair-tubes SEPP44
Safety Clothing vs Bird Survey Efficacy Scorpions Seasonal Trapability of Southern Brown Bandicoots Snake Tongs: Not ethical
Some comments on the limitations of Insurance Policies ECA members should b Sulphur-feathered Cockatoo Tadpole Traps Taxonomic Changes to Australian Birds
Terminology Threatened Fish Usage of Arboreal Termite Nests and Epiphytic Ferns by Fauna Vegetation Management Plans
Video Cams Walkie Talkies What a Graduate Should Know What is an EEC?
What! A Spotted-tailed Quoll in an A Elliot When does an introduced animal become considered a When does an introduced animal become considered a "native" species. non-natural habitat usage
view current topics


There are 2 messages under the topic 'Disturbances to Urban Waterbirds'
Posted by : Jenny Lewis 04/03/09 3:49 pm

You probably know this already Stephen, but Danny Rogers has done a lot of work on shorebird disturbance in Broome - he may have also done work in the area you're interested in.


Posted by : Stephen Ambrose 24/01/09 4:44 pm
Yesterday afternoon through to after dark I was observing the behaviour of waterbirds from the bird hide at the Waterbird Refuge, Sydney Olympic Park. Water levels at the wetland are quite low at the moment, so waterbird numbers in the early part of the afternoon were also quite low. However, from about 5 pm onwards the wetlands began to fill up with birds as they came in to roost for the night.

 

The main purpose of this email is to report briefly on the reactions of the waterbirds to helicopters flying low (300-400 m altitude over the wetland). During the day, the waterbirds were habituated to nearly all the disturbances around them, such as the noise from car/truck traffic flows along nearby Bennelong Parkway, Hill Road and Homebush Bay Drive, helicopters flying directly over the wetland or above the aforementioned roads, low-flying planes approaching Sydney Airport, and distant background noise from rock concerts associated with the Big Day Out Event at the nearby Sydney Showground.

The only noticeable reaction to daytime disturbances occurred when the occasional pedestrian using the nearby cycle/pedestrian path stopped and observed birds from the open shoreline, or when there was thunder & lightning. On these occasions, some species took flight and sounded alarm calls before settling back on the wetland (e.g. Black-winged Stilts), whereas others just swam or waded into deeper water near the centre of the wetland (e.g. Chestnut Teal, Grey Teal and Red-necked Avocets).

 

With respect to the thunder & lightning, it appeared that the birds became flighty in response to the thunder rather than the lightning. The storm was several kilometers away, so there was a gap of several seconds between the lightning and the sound of thunder.

With respect to helicopters, waterbirds did not react noticeably to helicopters flying overhead or nearby during the day. However, in the one hour that I stayed at the wetland after dusk, two helicopters flew directly over the wetland while the birds were roosting. Both helicopters had their pilot lights on, but these lights were not strong enough to illuminate the wetland. So, there was clearly a temporal change in the sensitivity of these birds to helicopter disturbance. It would be interesting to know if this was because they were roosting at the time of the disturbances, were disturbed by the helicopters’ pilot lights, are more sensitive to disturbances when it is dark, greater densities of birds on a wetland are more reactive to disturbances, or a combination of all of these things.
I’d like to hear of other peoples’ observations of background disturbances that waterbirds in urban environments have become habituated to, what background disturbances never lead to habituation, and whether there are any other observations of temporal sensitivities to background disturbances.



You must register or login to post messages


 
Ecological Consultants Association of NSW Inc.