Home About Find a Consultant How to Join Documents Links ECANSW Forum Positions Vacant


Available Topics
2009 ECA Conference 2010 ECA Conference Accreditation of Ecological Consultants Ants: The Natural Enemy of the Nest Box
Australia 2020 Summit Biobanking 2008: Its coming, ready or not... Biobanking assessor accreditation Biocertification
Blacks eating browns Blindsiding "Community Charity Magazine Advertising" Buffers Bush Tucker
Changes in Abundance of Migratory Shorebirds in Eastern Australia Coastal ecology Consultancy Fee Proposals Correct Spelling of Common Names of Bird Species
Damselfy on the Cover of Vol 21 Dead tree - stag or snag? Disturbances to Urban Waterbirds ECA Conference
ECA Conference 2008 ECA Workshops 2008 Elliott Trapping Ethical dilemma
Flora of the Sydney Region Flying-foxes and nectar in northern NSW GeneralNew strategic process for development to be tested in Kimberley Glossy Black Cockatoo Food Trees
How to Erect Nest Boxes and Recycled Hollow-Limbs Infrared Spotlights/Night Vision Optics Insurance Cover Introduction of native speices
Koalas Legal Responsibilities of Consultants Little Red Flying-foxes(?) At Penrith Marketing Scams
Marking Habitat Trees Miscellaneous Observations Mosquito Control NPWS Wildlife Atlas, Is it useful?
Nyctophilus timoriensis Planted threatened plants need 7 part test Pollution Law Prepaid Wireless Broadband
Published Field Guides RFEF on Coastal Floodplains: Where the bloody hell is it? Recommended Suppliers of Ecological Equipment Recycling office products
Reintroduction of native species Remote Sensor Digital Cameras Removing Tapes from Hair-tubes SEPP44
Safety Clothing vs Bird Survey Efficacy Scorpions Seasonal Trapability of Southern Brown Bandicoots Snake Tongs: Not ethical
Some comments on the limitations of Insurance Policies ECA members should b Sulphur-feathered Cockatoo Tadpole Traps Taxonomic Changes to Australian Birds
Terminology Threatened Fish Usage of Arboreal Termite Nests and Epiphytic Ferns by Fauna Vegetation Management Plans
Video Cams Walkie Talkies What a Graduate Should Know What is an EEC?
What! A Spotted-tailed Quoll in an A Elliot When does an introduced animal become considered a When does an introduced animal become considered a "native" species. non-natural habitat usage
view current topics


There are 5 messages under the topic 'Taxonomic Changes to Australian Birds'
Posted by : Stephen Ambrose 01/02/08 6:03 pm

Although this message is not directly relevant to ecological consultancy, the analysis of Christidis & Boles (2008) presented below was posted by Mike Carter on the Birding-aus Discussion Forum this afternoon. It may be of interest to consultants who are also twitchers:

COMPARISONS with the 1994 CHECKLIST

64 species are added to the main list. Of these:

11 are the result of taxonomic splits -

Vanuatu Petrel - one specimen but ID not assessed by BARC

Linchi Swiftlet

Variable Goshawk

Short-tailed Grasswren

Kalkadoon Grasswren

Kimberley Honeyeater

Western Wattlebird

Arafura Fantail

Pacific Robin

Buff-sided Robin

Green-headed Yellow Wagtail

1 is due to extended coverage to include the Australian Antarctic Territory -

Kerguelen Pintail - specimen record not assessed by BARC

1 introduced bird now with viable established populations -

Barbary Dove

2 introduced birds with viable populations upgraded from Supplementary List -

Helmeted Guineafowl

Green Junglefowl

9 upgraded from the Supplementary List because of BARC accepted records -

Atlantic Petrel

Laysan Albatross

Grey Heron

Green Sandpiper

Nordmann's Greenshank

American Golden Plover

Brown Shrike

Pechora Pipit

Singing Starling

5 upgraded from the Supplementary List though not assessed by BARC

Kerguelen Shag - specimen record

Corncrake - specimen record

Lesser Black-backed Gull - band recovered from dead bird

Buffy Fish-Owl - specimen record

House Crow - specimens in WA Museum & other reports

2 new species not assessed by BARC

Tiger Shrike - specimen record

Black-billed Magpie - 2 reports but no specimens so NOT admissable

33 BARC accepted new species - too numerous to list here.

 

Removals are:

1. - 4 Species from the Main List on taxonomic grounds - Snares Penguin - a peculiar decision?

Gould's Bronze-Cuckoo - always contentious Lesser Sooty Owl Black-backed Wagtail

2. - 15 Species in 1994 Supplementary List: Their reasons and some guesses at possible thinking!

Baikal Teal - likely confusion with Garganey?

Amsterdam Albatross - not now regarded as full species.

Chinese Egret - no real evidence?

Eastern Marsh Harrier - surprising as must be a possibility.

Oriental Hobby - confusion over species involved in claim on Christmas Island (Eurasian Hobby intended). Another erroneous claim.

Eurasian Curlew - surprising, as at least one only just failed acceptance.

Long-billed Dowitcher - original claim shown to be Short-billed Dowitcher.

Western Sandpiper - lacked even rudimentary evidence.

Temminck's Stint - several claims not pursued.

Cox's Sandpiper - shown to be a hybrid.

Rusty-tailed Gerygone - shown to be a variant of another species.

Tawny Pipit - shown to be an error.

Gray's Grasshopper Warbler - surprising as there have been several claims.

Pale-bellied Myna - escapees and failed introduction Hill Myna - escapees and failed introduction

3. - Species reported between 1994 and 2008 omitted or overlooked for inclusion in the Supplementary List:

Grey-headed Goshawk; [likely confusion with very pale form of local race of

another perhaps undescribed Goshawk] Chinese Goshawk - ID too difficult?

Japanese Sparrowhawk - ID too difficult?

Dark-rumped Swift - ID too difficult?

Mossy-nest Swiftlet - ID too difficult?

Frill-necked Monarch - specific status not confirmed.

Northern Wheatear - surprising because evidence was quite strong.


Posted by : Stephen Ambrose 01/02/08 5:58 pm

Deryk,

The mainstream ornithological/scientific literature  and the current legislation accepted the naming of birds by Christidis & Boles (1994). Therefore, they are likely to accept the names in the updated list (Christidis & Boles 2008). How long it will take for the names to be changed by the TSC and EPBC Acts (and other relevant acts elsewhere in Australia) is anyone's guess.

I am using the bird names from the new list in my consultancy reports, but also make reference to the old names as they are currently listed under the schedules of threatened species legislation. For instance, if I'm referring to the Eastern Osprey I would say something like:

"The Osprey (Pandion halieatus), listed as Vulnerable under the schedules of theTSC Act, has been renamed by Christidis & Boles (2008) as the Eastern Osprey (Pandion cristatus) in recognition that there are three, rather than one species, of Osprey in the world. The renaming of this species has not changed its Vulnerable status under the TSC Act."

This may sound a bit clumsy, but I think it is necessary to make these points  - at least until the legislation catches up -to avoid confusion by anyone reading consultancy reports (especially when reports are made available to a general audience). Anyway, that's just my personal approach; others may have alternative ones.


Posted by : Deryk Engel 01/02/08 12:12 pm

Stephen et al.

If the legilsation has not caught up with the new names, what naming would you recommend we use in our reports? Particularly in any appendicies that are produced as part of a literature review? In my reports I include the following

 

·         Cogger (2000) (used for teh identfiication of reptiles and frogs);

·         Simpson and Day (1999) (birds);

·         Strahan (1995) (mammals);

·         Churchill (1998) (insectivorous bats); and

·         Triggs (1996) (identification of scats, tracks and markings).

The naming of those species recorded or known to occur within the region follows the nomenclature presented within either these texts or as listed on the EPBC and TSC Acts.

Comments appreciated.

Deryk


Posted by : Jason Berrigan 30/01/08 9:38 pm

Thanks Stephen - sounds like a lot were overdue for updating!


Posted by : Stephen Ambrose 25/01/08 6:38 pm

Members should be aware that Christidis & Boles (2008) have produced the long-awaited new taxonomic list for Australian birds. Of particular note is the renaming of several bird species that are listed as threatened under the TSC and/or EPBC Acts.  These are the changes that I detected:

The scientific name of the Flesh-footed Shearwater has changed to Ardenna carneipes (formerly Puffinus carneipes). This is in recognition that there are now three instead of two genera of shearwaters (Puffinus, Calonectris and Ardenna). In Australian waters, the species that make up the Ardenna group are the Wedge-tailed Shearwater, Buller's Shearwater, Flesh-footed Shearwater, Pink-footed Shearwater, Great Shearwater, Sooty Shearwater and Short-tailed Shearwater.

The Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) has been renamed as the Eastern Osprey (Pandion cristatus) in recognition that there are three species of osprey in the world.

The Bush-hen (Amaurornis olivacea) has been renamed as the Pale-vented Bush-hen (Amaurornis moluccana) in recognition that the Australian species is genetically distinct from the species in the Philippines.

The Pied Oystercatcher has been renamed the Australian Pied Oystercatcher. It's scientific name (Haematopus longirostris) has remained unchanged.

The scientific names of the Little Tern and Sooty Tern have changed to Sternula albifrons (formerly Sterna albifrons) and Onchyprion fuscata (formerly Sterna fuscata), respectively, because the genus Sterna has been broken into three separate genera: the brown-backed terns (Onchyprion), little terns (Sternula) and other terns (Sterna).

The Grey Noddy (Procelsterna albivitta) has been lumped with  the Grey Ternlet (Procelsterna cerulea).

The scientific name of the Major Mitchell's Cockatoo is now Lophochroa leadbeateri (formerly Cacatua leadbeateri) because the genus Cacatua has been broken into three separate genera: Cacatua (corellas and white cockatoos), Eolophus (Galah) and Lophochroa (Major Mitchell's Cockatoo).

The scientific name of the Eastern Grass Owl is now Tyto longimembris (formerly T. capensis), separating it from the Eastern Grass Owl of southern Africa.

The scientific name of the Shy Heathwren has changed to Hylacola cauta (formerly Calamanthus cautus) as a result of moving both heathwren species (Chestnut-rumped and Shy Heathwrens) out of the genus Calamanthus (fieldwrens).

The scientific name of the Speckled Warbler has changed to Cthonicola sagittata (formerly Pyrrholaemus sagittatus), removing it from the same genus as the Redthroat (Pyrrholaemus brunneus).

The scientific name of the Regent Honeyeater is now Anthochaera phrygia (formerly Xanthomyza phrygia). This is because the Regent Honeyeater has been grouped with the wattlebirds (Anthochaera spp.). The authors decided against renaming this species the Regent Wattlebird.

The scientific name of the White-eared Monarch has changed to Carterornis leucotis (formerly Monarcha leucotis), normally a Pacific Island species that has been removed from the Monarcha genus whose taxa are normally found in PNG and Australia.

The above-mentioned changes would not change the listed status of bird species under the schedules of the TSC and EPBC Acts. I'm sure that the administrators of these acts will catch up with the name changes in due course.

Reference:

Christidis, L. and Boles, W.E. (2008). Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds (CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood).




You must register or login to post messages


 
Ecological Consultants Association of NSW Inc.